Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Google Apps Admins Jittery About Gmail, Hopeful About Future

When Gmail crashed on Monday, affecting many organizations that depend on it for work e-mail via the Google Apps suite, widespread gnashing of teeth ensued.

At Alaska's APTI public TV and radio station, reporters working on deadline scrambled to gather information without e-mail as a tool.

In the middle of an important press announcement, staffers at San Francisco Internet startup Kwiry sought alternate ways to stay in touch with contacts.

At Davidoff Communications, the outage hit less than 24 hours after the Chicago company's migration of its five users to Google Apps.

"Since we're only on day four of our implementation, let's just say if Apps were on my baseball team, it would be hitting at the bottom of the lineup," said Davidoff Systems Administrator Mitch Wilkos in an e-mail interview this week.

With its Apps hosted suite of communications and collaboration applications, Google is a leading proponent of software-as-a-service (SaaS), an emerging model of software delivery that backers say represents the future.

Because vendors host applications in their own data centers, companies don't have to concern themselves with hardware provisioning and software maintenance. By living in the Internet "cloud," these hosted applications simplify sharing and collaboration among employees.

However, the experience of users living through the recent Google Apps outages could serve as a deterrent to some IT and business managers who might not be ready to ditch conventional software packages that are installed on their servers.

If a company relies on Google Apps for its e-mail, its IT and business managers have little to do when a Gmail outage hits them, and, with end-users demanding explanations, this waiting game can be a very stressful situation, as John Proffitt, IT services director at APTI, can attest.

"For me as the Google Apps administrator, the disruption was pretty damn irritating. Aside from getting kicked out of e-mail I need to do my own job, it also forced me to completely refocus on figuring out what's happening with Gmail and Google Apps," he said in an e-mail interview.

For the two hours that the outage lasted, Proffitt estimates that about 75 percent of the organization's approximately 40 employees were affected, some severely, including the journalists who make up about a quarter of the staff.

"It was constant troubleshooting, testing, research, posting to the Google Apps forums and so on. Plus there's the emotional strain of wondering whether you completely screwed up by moving everyone to Google Apps as our sole e-mail system. That's what freaked me out: Did Google just make me look like an idiot?" Proffitt added.

That's not a nice feeling to have, especially since Proffitt did his homework and took his time before deciding to move his end-users to Google Apps. He used the suite for about nine months himself "as a guinea pig" and then rolled it out to the entire organization six weeks ago.

Prior to Monday's crash, his satisfaction level with Google Apps was about 90 percent. Now he puts it at 70 percent.

"Mostly that 20 percent drop is based on fear of another, perhaps more damaging, outage. It hasn't happened, but now I know it could happen any time and without warning, and if it does I have virtually no recourse to get the service running again," he said.

Monday's outage was sandwiched between two other Gmail crashes -- one last week and another one on Thursday and Friday of this week, both of which were smaller in scale. Proffitt wasn't affected by those other outages, but he's ready to rethink his status as hosted software adopter if things don't go well in the future.

"If we began to experience a similar outage more than about two or three business hours per quarter, we'd probably make Google Apps and Gmail a backup solution to a locally hosted mail system, if we used it at all. And it would likely be years before we'd try a cloud-based collaborative system again from any vendor," Proffitt said.

Still, Proffitt and other Apps administrators interviewed are hoping that Google will quickly strengthen the reliability of Gmail and the other suite components to a point where crashes become extremely rare. The benefits Apps offers to their small and medium-size organizations are significant in terms of cost savings and the flexibility of Web-based software.

"Even though we've only had Apps for a few days, I'm already impressed with the customization options. The ability to completely ditch Outlook makes Apps a worthwhile service to our company," said Davidoff's Wilkos. "The Gmail interface feels more intuitive and is significantly quicker than Outlook. And the mobile accessibility is a huge improvement over our old e-mail service."

Although Monday's outage stung Kwiry on an important day, and the startup was hit briefly again on Thursday, CEO Ron Feldman is betting on Google Apps. "Google understands its tremendous responsibility to keep things up and running," Feldman said via e-mail.

Carlos Leyva, managing shareholder at Digital Business Law Group, is also confident in Google and is sold on the SaaS model, which he expects will allow his new law firm to grow quickly without having to spend a fortune on its computing infrastructure.

"No one's happy when there's downtime, but there's always downtime. I've seen Exchange go down often. Many times you're left to your own IT people to fix it. That can be good or bad. I'd rather it be Google's problem. They've got a world-class team. Their reputation is on the line. Over time, they're going to get better and better," he said in a phone interview.

Thomas Harbinson, president of IDA International in Derby, Connecticut, found Monday's outage a minor disruption for the engineering and construction service company's 11 users. They have been very satisfied with Apps, which the company has been using for about a year after migrating away from Exchange.

"As a small organization looking at pre-Google Apps practice, if it had been my hardware in-house that went down, I would not have had anywhere near the reaction time and response to be restored as Google did with the Apps service," Harbinson said via e-mail.

Copyright © 2008 IDG News Service. All rights reserved. IDG News Service is a trademark of International Data Group, Inc.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Yahooh Google Partnership


Sunnyvale -- Yahoo! Inc. and Google Inc. have agreed to a plan in which Google-brokered ads will appear with some Yahoo! search results, the Los Angeles Times said Thursday.







Yahoo, based in Sunnyvale, Calif., announced the deal following the end of talks with Microsoft Corp.

Microsoft had announced earlier in the day it and Yahoo! had broken off talks on "an alternative transaction" following the collapse of talks two weeks on a Microsoft acquisition of Yahoo!

In a statement, Yahoo!, said the deal with Google could be worth an additional $800 million in its annual revenue.

In addition to Google-brokered ads appearing along with some Yahoo! search results, such ads would also appear on some of Yahoo!'s Web pages.

Yahoo! said the deal is non-exclusive, so it is free to reach similar agreements with other ad providers, the newspaper reported.

The companies said they would wait 3 ½ months before inaugurating the new arrangement to give the Justice Department time to review it, even though they said it did not requite regulatory approval.

Microsoft had been exploring acquisition of Yahoo! as part of a strategy to rival Google in the Web advertising market, but the effort instead led to the new arrangement between Yahoo! and Google, the Times said.

Yahoo Merge Google


Well well well............................... wooooooooooooohoooooooooo

yahoo is finally getting its way with the google............


The latest

NEW YORK -

Shares of Yahoo Inc. fell in premarket trading Friday after the Internet pioneer ended Microsoft Corp.'s bid to merge the companies and instead sought a deal with rival Google Inc.

Yahoo (nasdaq: YHOO - news - people ) announced its decision to let Google (nasdaq: GOOG - news - people ) handle some of its advertising sales late Thursday, leaving Microsoft (nasdaq: MSFT - news - people )'s $47.5 billion buyout offer for dead.

Yahoo shares lost 2.3 percent to $22.97 from Thursday's close of $23.52, while Microsoft's stock rose 9 cents_ a third of a percent - to $28.33. Google shares rose $6.05, just over one percent, to $559 in early action.

Shares of Perfect World Co. Ltd. soared 9 percent to $23.85 after the Chinese online gaining company raised its guidance for the second quarter on favorable marketing results and new product launches.



well today Yahoo is giving some its work to the Google ..........

and in the future .............. what.?????????

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

PayPal Plans to Ban Unsafe Browsers - Including Safari?

In a whitepaper entitled "A Practical Approach to Managing Phishing", PayPal has announced their approach to phishing, including banning users from performing sensitive transactions using browsers which do not have adequate protections against phishing.

We've previously reported that PayPal considers Safari to be insecure for exactly these reasons. Ergo, it would seem that PayPal is planning to disallow the use of Apple's Safari for transactions.

See Ryan Naraine's story in eWEEK for more information on these developments.

Whale Phishing

One of the things I love about cutting-edge technology is the way we get to invent fun, new terminology. It seems to have been around before, but I just came across my first reference to "whale phishing." It describes a phish where the target is a very important person, such as a CEO, i.e. a very big target.

An example of the phenomenon was written up in this Internet Storm Center writeup which describes a phony subpoena request sent to several CEOs, purportedly from the US Courts. It was further written up by McAfee, including a screen shot, in their blog. The recipient is give a link to click on; if they do so, they are asked to install a "browser plug-in" in order to view the document; the file is named Acrobat.exe. If they do so, they are served with malware which McAfee classifies as TROJ_AGENT.AMAL.

Of course, the US Courts don't e-mail subpoena requests directly to CEOs.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

"What is 'TMI'? What Does It Mean?"

So, you're conversing online in a chat room or in an internet game, and you keep seeing this odd expression "TMI". People send this "tmi" message periodically, but without any explanation.

Well, this peculiar acronym expression is a funny expression of distaste. It stands for "too much information!". It is the same as saying "I didn't need to hear that" or "that is taboo or obnoxious for you to share that". The tmi expression, like many other Internet expressions, is part of online conversation culture.

"What is a 'Hacker'? Is that the same as a 'hax0r'?"

You've heard of "hackers", and you've seen sensationalized versions of hackers in movies. But what exactly is a hacker? And are they the same as "haxors"?

Originally, a "hacker" was someone who illegally and unethically broke into other people's computers and networks. And indeed, that original 1980's definition still applies today in the 21st century. However, the term "hacker" (also spelled creatively as "haxor" and "Hax0r") now has multiple sub-meanings.

General meaning: hacker = lawbreaker
A hacker/haxor/Hax0r is a gifted but unethical computer user who breaks into computers and networks, usually to perform theft or digital vandalism. This is the classic definition of a hacker, and describes those computer users who willfully seek to destroy or steal from other people's networks.

Academic meaning: hacker = creative artist
An "academic hacker" is not interested in vandalizing or stealing, but rather in creating clever programs and beautiful interfaces.
Often, an academic hacker will take existing programmatic code, and improve upon it through clever alterations and additions. Their "hacking" is about obsessively innovating computer code to perform something more beautifully or more efficiently. Academic hackers, in general, are harmless and do not seek to hurt other people's networks.

Computer Security meaning: hacker = security technician
Not unlike a store security guard who is a former convict, a computer security hacker is a talented user who is employed in helping to protect computer networks. You will hear the term "ethical hacker" to describe these types of professionals. While they themselves may not be completely ethical, these professionals perform very technical security work in exchange for money. It is not surprising to see ethical hackers spending their paychecks on very expensive personal computers in their personal lives, so they can play online games after work. As long as they have a good paying job to support their personal habits, a computer security hacker is usually not motivated to destroy nor steal from their employer.

Hobby Computer meaning: hacker = tinkerer
There are many "hobby hackers" out there. These are users who like to disassemble and modify their own computers for hobby pleasure. Many hobby hackers are gamers who want to extract even more performance from their gaming computers. These individuals will often spend thousands of dollars on custom computer cases and liquid cooling modifications. But hobby hackers also like to do small "white collar crimes", like downloading pirated movies and music. By this definition, yes, millions of p2p downloaders are hobby hackers. And indeed, if you have ever modified your router and firewall to allow faster p2p downloads, you could describe yourself as a hobby hacker. Gratefully, only a small percentage of hobby hackers ever escalate into becoming unethical hackers.

The Invisible Web

i think you might be wondering what the hell is thus "Invisible Web????"

Many untrained users have the naive expectation that they can locate anything on the world wide web by using Google or Yahoo or Ask.com. No, as powerful as these search engines are, they do not index everything on the world wide web. In fact, search engines index less than 10% of the entire web! That remaining 90% is called the "Invisible Web", or in other words, "The Cloaked Web" or "The Deep Web". This is the massive content that is publicly available, but hidden from regular search engines.

Indeed, this is a tough concept to grasp - that billions of web pages cannot be found by Google. But it's true, billions of pages are beyond the abilities of search engine cataloging. The robot "spiders" which scan and catalog the world wide web are limited... they cannot see nor index everything.

To better visualize this concept, let's start with some size estimates from Google.com, Yahoo.com, Cyberatlas, and MIT. These stats are current to Fall 2007:
  • Google.com indexes 12.5 billion public web pages.
  • 71 billion static web pages are publicly-available. These pages can easily be found by Google and other search engines. (e.g. www.honda.com, www.australia.gov.au)
  • 6.5 billion static pages are hidden from the public. As private intranet content, these are the corporate pages that are only open to employees of specific companies. (e.g. employees.honda.com, secure.australia.gov.au)
  • 220+ billion database-driven pages are completely invisible to Google. These invisible pages are not the regular web pages you and I can make. Rather, these are dynamic database reports that exist only when called from large databases.
    (e.g. custom online car quote for Shelly, Australian government discussion on aboriginal taxation)
Google, considered the best search database today, can only catalog a fraction of this monstrous content. Even with electronic spiders to catalog millions of web pages each week, Google current indexes only 12.5 billion out of the 220+ billion pages out there...less than 6% of all available internet content.

So if Google only catalogs 6% of the World Wide Web, and other search engines catalog even less, then where is the remaining 90%of web content hidden?
Invisible Web